Endovenous Treatment Of Superficial Chronic Venous Disease In A Strict Ambulatory Setting: A Single-Center Experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.624Keywords:
Chronic venous disease, Varicose veins, Endovenous treatment, Radiofrequency ablation, Foam sclerotherapy, Ambulatory surgeryAbstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive endovenous techniques have become central to the treatment of superficial chronic venous disease (CVD) of the lower limbs. Their ability to avoid general or locoregional anaesthesia allows treatment to be performed in an outpatient setting.
Objective: To evaluate clinical and duplex ultrasound outcomes of endovenous treatment of superficial CVD performed exclusively in a strict ambulatory setting.
Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted, including patients treated for superficial CVD between January 2017 and March 2019. Treatments modalities included radiofrequency ablation, catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy, and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy by direct puncture. Clinical status was assessed using the CEAP classification. Duplex ultrasound follow-up was performed according to the institutional follow-up protocol.
Results: Ninety-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 67 years and predominance of CEAP C2-C3 disease (86%). Axial reflux was treated by radiofrequency ablation in 78% of patients and catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy in 22%. At 12 months, 95% of treated saphenous segments were completely occluded, with a recanalization rate of 2.5%. CEAP reassessment at 12 months was available for 84 patients, of whom 87% were classified as CEAP C0-C1. All patients initially classified as CEAP C5 or C6 were lost to follow-up before the 12-month assessment. All procedures were performed on an outpatient basis, with same-day discharge.
Conclusions: Endovenous treatment of superficial chronic venous disease in a strict ambulatory setting was feasible and associated with high anatomical success at 12 months. Clinical follow-up findings were favorable among the assessed patients, but should be interpreted in light of the loss to follow-up among patients with more advanced baseline CEAP classes.
Downloads
References
De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T, Baekgaard N, Black S, Blomgren L, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(2):184-267.
Paravastu SCV, Horne M, Dodd PDF. Endovenous ablation therapy (laser or radiofrequency) or foam sclerotherapy versus surgery for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2016;103(5):436-446.
Nordon IM, Hinchliffe RJ, Brar R, Moxey P, Black SA, Thompson MM. A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein. Ann Surg. 2011;254(6):876-881.
Tessari L. Nouvelle technique d'obtention de la scleromousse. Phlebologie. 2000;53:129-133.
De Abreu GCG, Silva ES, Caffaro RA, Rollo HA. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for severe chronic venous disease. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2017;44(6):511-517.
Singhal S. Endovascular management of varicose veins: thermal ablation, mechanochemical ablation and foam sclerotherapy. Interv Radiol Interv Oncol. 2019;3(2):60-66.
Orsini C, Brogi M, Michelagnoli S, Chisci E. Is endovascular treatment of the great saphenous vein with immediate foam sclerotherapy in an outpatient clinic safe and effective? Acta Phlebol. 2021;22(3):79-83.
Cartee TV, Combs K, Gillespie DL. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is safe and effective for superficial venous reflux. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(4):998-1005.
Farah MH, Raju S, Neglen P, Comerota AJ. Systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:20503121221106366.
Rasmussen LH, Lawaetz M, Serup J, Bjoern L, Vennits B, Blemings A, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2011;98(8):1079-1087.
van der Velden SK, Lawaetz M, De Maeseneer MG, et al. Predictors of recanalization after endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016;4(1):51-57.
Brittenden J, Cotton SC, Elders A, et al. A randomized trial comparing treatments for varicose veins. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(13):1218-1227.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
