THE IMPACT OF PATIENT TRANSFER AFTER RUPTURE OF AN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.90Abstract
Objective: determine whether patient transfer adversely affects the survival of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) patients after conventional surgery.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing attempted repair of an rAAA at a tertiary center, over January 2008 and December 2014. Patients were divided into those presenting directly to our center and those transferred from another hospital. The main outcome variable was 24-hour or 30-day mortality, with secondary variables including time to surgical treatment, length of intensive care unit stay and total length hospitalization.
Results: 78 patients (88% men) underwent attempted open repair of an rAAA during this period, 69% (54 cases) were transferred from another institution. Both groups were similar in terms of demographic characteristics, comorbidities and hemodynamic stability. The overall mortality rate was 51% at 30 days. Transferred patients took twice as long as direct patients to get to the operating room (median 7,9 vs. 3,9 horas, p < 0,05), Although the difference for surgery treatment, there was no difference in 24-hour and 30-day mortality between the transferred group and direct group (26% e 50% vs. 29% e 58%, p < 0,05). Mean intensive care unit stay (median, 12 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) and total hospitalization (median 11 vs. 4 dias, p = 0,04) were substantially superior in the transferred group.
Conclusions: Transfer of patients with RAAA in this series results in a doubling of the time interval between initial patient presentation and arrival in the operating room. This, however, did not result in any disadvantage in the survival rate between the groups. The total length and resources consumption were higher in the transfer group. These results may be attributed to a pre-selection of patients (clinically stable) who are able to tolerate such a delay in surgical treatment, secondary to transfer.
Downloads
References
Krupski WC, Rutherford RB. Update on open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The challenges for endovascular
repair. J Am Coll Surg 2004;199:946-61.
Reimerink JJ, Hoornweg LL, Vahl AC, et al; Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Aug;258(2):248-56.
Bown MJ, Sutton AJ, Bell PRF, et al. A meta-analysis of 50 years of ruptured aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 2002;89:714-30.
Siracuse JJ, Krafcik BM, Farber A, et al; Contemporary open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg.
Dec 13;
Fernandes e Fernandes J, et al; Rede de Referenciação em Cirurgia Vascular document, DGS, sns.gov.pt; 2016.
Papagoras, D. & Kanara, M. Does the transfer time of a patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm play a significant role in survival? Hellenic J Surg (2014) 86: 150.
Hames H, Forbes TL, Harris JR, et al. The effect of patient transfer on outcomes after rupture of an abdominal aortic
aneurysm. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2007;50(1):43-47.
Vogel TR, Nackman GB, Brevetti LS, et al. Resource utilization and outcomes: Effect of transfer on patients with ruptured
abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 2005;19:149-53.
Proctor VK, Lee MJ, Nassef AH, Outcomes of regional transfer of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in a UK vascular
network. Ann R Coll Engl 2017;99: 88-92.
Mell MW, Starnes BJ, Kraiss LW; Western Vascular Society guidelines for transfer of patients with ruptured abdominal
aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 2017;65:603-8.
Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, et al: Volume-outcome relationships in vascular surgery: the current status.
J Endovasc Ther. 17 (3):356-365 2010
Holt PJ, Poloniecki JG, Gerrard D. et al; Meta-analysis and systematic review of the relationship between volume and
outcome in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg. 94 (4):395-403 2007.
Mureebe, L., Egorova, N., Giacovelli, J.K., Gelijns, A., Kent, K.C., and McKinsey, J.F. National trends in the repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48: 1101–1107
Lesperance, K., Andersen, C., Singh, N., Starnes, B., and Martin, M.J. Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47: 1165–1170
Robinson WP, Schanzer A, Aiello FA, Flahive J, Simons JP, Doucet DR, Arous E, Messina LM; Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms does not reduce later mortality compared with open repair; J Vasc Surg. 2016;63(3):617.
IMPROVE Trial Investigators ; Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2017;359:j4859. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
Comparative clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of endovascular strategy v open repair for ruptured abdominal
aortic aneurysm: three year results of the IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2017;359:j4859. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
Nedeau, A.E., Pomposelli, F.B., Hamdan, A.D., Wyers, M.C., Hsu, R., Sachs, T. et al. Endovascular vs open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2012; 56: 15–20.
Reimerink, J.J., Hoornweg, L.L., Vahl, A.C., Wisselink, W., van den Broek, T.A., Legemate, D.A. et al. Endovascular repair versus open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013; 258: 248–256.
