Hot Topic In Thoracic Surgery: Can Sublobar Anatomical Resections Be Non-Inferior To Lobectomies For Small, Peripheral Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)? 9 Year Experience In A Single Center

Authors

  • Agata Nawojowska Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Samuel Mendes Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Daniel Cabral Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Marion Emma Gaspar Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Cristina Rodrigues Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Mariana Antunes Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-9772
  • Magda Alvoeiro Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-0597
  • Telma Calado Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal
  • Francisco Félix Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Pulido Valente – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.405

Keywords:

segmentectomy, sublobar anatomical ressection, lung-sparing surgery, T1N0M0, peripheral lung nodule

Abstract

Background: Technological advances and widely spread screening programs enabled the discovery of ever smaller lesions. As such, in the last years, the tendency has shifted towards lung-sparing procedures. The role of limited surgical excision for small peripheral nodules is currently a topic of heated debate.

Aim: In our work, we try to answer whether the segmentectomy could adequately treat the peripheral NSCLC staged as Tis/1a-bN0M0.

Materials and methods: Our analysis is a single-center retrospective study based on the 8-year experience of our department. We identified 73 lobectomy patients and 16 segmentectomy patients. However, the lack of similarity between the two groups made it inadequate to draw satisfactory conclusions, therefore we reduced the lobectomy group and selected only those patients who could be paired with corresponding patients in the segmentectomy group. The established parameters of similarity were age (weighted at 15%), size of the lesion (50%), and follow-up (35%), and the input values were normalized. With this method, we could compare two samples of the most similar patients. 32 cases were included in the final analysis. The inclusion criteria were: NSCLC histology, size up to 2 cm, no visceral pleura invasion, N0 disease, and performed segmentectomy or lobectomy between Jan/2015 and Dec/2022. We analyzed the disease-free time and relapse rate.

Results: Data refers to a total of 32 patients distributed in two groups: group A with 16 segmentectomies (S6, S1+2 or S1) and group B with 16 lobectomies. The mean time of follow-up was 30 months (1-85) for group A and 32 months (1-91) for group B. The disease-free survival was 27 months for group A and 31 months for group B. The relapse rate was 19% for segmentectomies and 12.5% for lobectomies.

Conclusions: In conclusion, while this article presents our center's experience with segmentectomy, we believe further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to establish its non-inferiority. Nevertheless, our experience indicates that segmentectomy offers significant benefits, including lung preservation and the potential for future resections.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Graham EA, Singer JJ. Successful removal of an entire lung for carcinoma of the bronchus. JAMA 1933;101:1371-74. 10.1001/jama.1933.02740430017005

Landreneau RJ, Schuchert MJ. Is segmentectomy the future? J Thorac Dis 2019;11(1):308-318. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.67

Shimkin MB, Connelly RR, Marcus SC, Cutler SJ. Pneumonectomy and lobectomy in bronchogenic carcinoma: A comparison of end results of the Overholt and Ochsner clinics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1962 Oct;44(4):503–519. doi:10.1016/S0022-5223(19)32943-5. PMID:13988545.

Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995 Sep;60(3):615-22; discussion 622-3. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)90033-0. PMID: 7677489.

Okada M, Yoshikawa K, Hatta T, Tsubota N. Is segmentectomy with lymph node assessment an alternative to lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of 2 cm or smaller? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Mar;71(3):956-60; discussion 961. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02232-2. PMID: 11269480.

Altorki N, Wang X, Kozono D, Watt C, Landrenau R, Wigle D, Port J, Jones DR, Conti M, Ashrafi AS, Liberman M, Yasufuku K, Yang S, Mitchell JD, Pass H, Keenan R, Bauer T, Miller D, Kohman LJ, Stinchcombe TE, Vokes E. Lobar or Sublobar Resection for Peripheral Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb;93:888(64):489-498. doi: 10.1056/NEJMca2212083. PMID: 36708074; PMCID: PMC10036605.

Saji H, Okada M, Tsuboi M, et al. Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in small-sized peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer (JCGG0802/WJOG46071): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2022;399(10335):1607–1617. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00341-3.

Downloads

Published

04-08-2025

How to Cite

1.
Nawojowska A, Mendes S, Cabral D, Gaspar ME, Rodrigues C, Antunes M, Alvoeiro M, Calado T, Félix F. Hot Topic In Thoracic Surgery: Can Sublobar Anatomical Resections Be Non-Inferior To Lobectomies For Small, Peripheral Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)? 9 Year Experience In A Single Center. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 4 [cited 2025 Sep. 8];32(2):31-5. Available from: https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/405

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3