Concerning the TNM 9th edition - Go forth and validate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.559Downloads
References
Detterbeck FC, Asamura H, Rami-Porta R, Rusch WV. The Only Constant Is Change: Introducing the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Proposals for the Ninth Edition of TNM Stage Classification of Thoracic Tumors. J Thorac Oncol. 2023;18(10):1258-60.
Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925-31.
Justice AC CK, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(6):515-24.
Stevens RJ, Poppe KK. Validation of clinical prediction models: what does the ‘calibration slope’ really measure? J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;118:93-9.
Van Calster B, McLernon DJ, van Smeden M, Wynants L, Steyerberg EW, Topic Group ‘Evaluating diagnostic t, et al. Calibration: the Achilles heel of predictive analytics. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):230.
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26(6):565-74.
Cai J, Li Y, Yang F. Caucasian validation of downstaging from IIB to IIA in T1N1M0 patients within the 9th edition of the non-small cell lung cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging. Cancer Med. 2024;13(14):e70018.
Wang RR, Li MJ, Peng Q, Huang ZY, Wu LI, Xie D. Validation of the 9th edition of the TNM staging system for non-small cell lung cancer with lobectomy in stage IA-IIIA. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024;65(3).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
