Ultrasound-guided central line insertion: how much evidence is really needed?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.217

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Law MA, Borasino S, McMahon WS, Alten JA. Ultrasoundversus landmark-guided femoral catheterization in the pediatric catheterization laboratory: a randomized-controlled trial. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014;35(7):1246-52.

Robinson MK, Mogensen KM, Grudinskas GF, Kohler S, Jacobs DO. Improved care and reduced costs for patients requiring peripherally inserted central catheters: the role of bedside ultrasound and a dedicated team. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29(5):374-9.

Iwashima S, Ishikawa T, Ohzeki T. Ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided femoral vein access in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008;29(2):339-42.

Vasconcelos-Castro S, Flor-de-Lima B, Soares-Oliveira M. Ultrasound-guided central line insertion in children: how much imaging is really needed? Portuguese Journal of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2021 (4).

Downloads

Published

04-01-2022

How to Cite

1.
Rocha Neves J. Ultrasound-guided central line insertion: how much evidence is really needed?. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 4 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];28(4):15-6. Available from: https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/217

Issue

Vol. 28 No. 4 (2021): October - December

Section

Editorial Comment

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.