AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESIS TYPE AND AGE - NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS?

Authors

  • Nuno Carvalho Guerra Cardiothoracic surgeon Associated Editor - Cardiac Surgery University Hospital Santa Maria - CHLN, Lisbon, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.23

Abstract

.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rocha R, Cerqueira RJ, Saraiva FA, Moreira S, Barros AS, Almeida J, Amorim MJ, Lourenço AP, Pinho P, Leite-Moreira A. Early and Midterm Outcomes following Aortic Valve Replacement with Mechanical versus Bioprosthetic Valves in Patients aged 50 to 70 Years. Rev Port Cir Cardiothor Vasc. 2020

Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(36):2739-2791. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391

Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312(2):162-170. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.7246

Gozdek M, Raffa GM, Suwalski P, Kołodziejczak M, Anisimowicz L, Kubica J et al. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017; doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezx347.

Downloads

Published

17-04-2021

How to Cite

1.
Carvalho Guerra N. AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESIS TYPE AND AGE - NO NEWS IS GOOD NEWS?. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc [Internet]. 2021 Apr. 17 [cited 2024 May 22];27(3):155-6. Available from: https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/23

Most read articles by the same author(s)