Long-Term Impact Of Permanent Pacing After Mitral Valve Surgery: A Scoping Review Of Current Literature

Authors

  • Adham El Sherbini Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9966-0599
  • Amin Hasheminia Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
  • Nazanin Soghrati School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-2374
  • Aparna Kuchibhatla School of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0336-4311
  • Salah Elsherif Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
  • Mohamed Abdel-Halim Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Yasir Abu-Omar Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0728-9884
  • Marc Pelletier Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • Mohammad El-Diasty Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Division of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-8397

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48729/pjctvs.479

Abstract

Background: Conduction disorders after mitral valve surgery (MVS) are frequent with a considerable percentage of patients requiring the implantation of a permanent pacemaker (PPM). This has been associated with prolonged hospital length of stay and increased resource utilization. In this scoping review, we consolidate the current evidence on the impact of PPM on late outcomes after MVS in terms of heart failure and mortality.
Methods: A comprehensive electronic literature search was conducted on Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar using the keywords (‘mitral valve repair’, ‘mitral valve replacement’, ‘pacemaker implantation’). The search was performed in November 2023. Studies were included if they involved adults ≥18 years old who underwent MVS, reported the long-term outcomes of PPM implantation, and were observational or randomized control trials. Exclusion criteria included case series, case reports, conference abstracts, and non-English studies.
Results: Literature search identified 2263 citations, of which, four studies, with a total of 49,006 patients (of which, 38,063 underwent mitral valve procedures) were ultimately included in this review. The incidence of PPM after MVS ranged between 4.2-11.8%. Factors associated with higher PPM risk, including advanced age, concomitant surgical procedures, pre-existing atrial fibrillation, conduction disorders, and ischemic heart disease, were chosen for their consistent identification across multiple studies. Data was not conclusive on whether there was a correlation between PPM implantation and an increased risk of late congestive heart failure or mortality.
Conclusions: We did not find enough evidence to suggest that permanent pacing may have negative impact on late outcomes after mitral valve surgery. This may be explained by the heterogeneity of the included studies and the complex nature and multi-factorial etiology of post-surgical electric conduction disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ghauri H, Iqbal R, Ahmed S, Ashraf A, Khan MSQ, Malik J, Zaidi SMJ, Almas T. Predictors of permanent pacemaker insertion after mitral valve replacement: A systematic review. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 May;45(5):681-687. doi: 10.1111/pace.14484. Epub 2022 Apr 9. PMID: 35304920.

Moskowitz G, Hong KN, Giustino G, Gillinov AM, Allawadi G, DeRose JJ Jr, Iribarne A, Moskowitz AJ, Geilips AC, Egorova NN. Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Following Mitral or Aortic Valve Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 26;74(21):2607-2620.

Gatta F, Haqqad Y, Loubani M. Permanent pacemaker post-valve surgery: Do valve type and position matter? A propensity score matching study. J. Clin. Transl. Res. 2021;7:786-91.

Helmers MR, Shin M, Iyengar A, Arguelles GR, Mays J, Han JJ, Patrick W, Altshuler P, Hargrove WC, Atluri P. Permanent pacemaker implantation following mitral valve surgery: a retrospective cohort study of risk factors and long-term outcomes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jul 14;60(1):140-147. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/exab091. PMID: 33659995.

Maidel K, Meester E. Early Complications After Pacemaker Implantations [Internet]. In: Min M, editor. Cardiac Pacemakers - Biological Aspects, Clinical Applications and Possible Complications. InTech; 2011 [cited 2023 Jun 7]. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/cardiac-pacemakers-biological-aspects-clinical-applications-and-possible-complications/early-complications-after-pacemaker-implantations

Steyers CM, Khera R, Bhave P. Pacemaker Dependency after Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Evidence. PLOS ONE 2015;10:e0140340.

Majewski JP, Lelakowski J. Pacemaker dependency: how should it be defined? EP Eur. 2018;20:1708-1708.

ElDiasiy M, Davies M, Fernandez AL, Ribeiro I, Payne D, Petsikas D. Does Pacemaker Implantation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Impact Long-Term Morbidity and Mortality? A Focused Review. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2022;49:e207518.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamser L, Tetzlaff JM, AKI EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hröhlstrason A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71.

Andersson C, Schou M, Gislason GH, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Monahan KM. Long-term risk of heart failure and mortality following mitral valve surgery in patients with and without right ventricular pacemaker. J. Card. Surg. 2020;35:2598-604.

Leyva F, Qiu T, McNulty D, Evison F, Marshall H, Gasparini M. Long-term requirement for pacemaker implantation after cardiac valve replacement surgery. Heart Rhythm 2017;14:529-34.

Viles-Gonzalez JF, Enriquez AD, Castillo JG, Coffey JO, Pastori L, Reddy VY, Adams DH, Fuster V. Incidence, predictors, and evolution of conduction disorders and atrial arrhythmias after contemporary mitral valve repair. Cardiol J. 2014;21(5):569-75. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2014.0016. Epub 2014 Feb 14. PMID: 24526511.

Gauss A, Hubner C, Radermacher P, Georgieff M, Schutz W. Perioperative Risk of Bradyarrhythmias in Patients with Asymptomatic Chronic Bifasciular Block or Left Bundle Branch Block. Anesthesiology 1998;88:679-87.

Gustav V, Goldenberg G, Segev A, Dur D, Kornowski R, Finkelstein A, Hay I, Goldenberg I, Gilkson M. Predictors and course of high-degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the CoreValve Revolving System. Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 1;108(11):1600-5.

Ngiam JN, Liong TS, Sim MY, Chew NWS, Sia CH, Chan SP, Lim TW, Yeo TC, Tambyah PA, Loh PH, Poh KK, Kong WK. Risk Factors for Mortality in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2022 May 29;11(11):3063.

Raza SS, Li JM, John R, Chen LY, Tholakanahalli VN, Mbai M, Adabag AS. Long-term mortality and pacing outcomes of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac surgery. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Mar;34(3):331-8.

Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Napeckowski A, Oren JW, Storm RH, Ellenbogen KA, Vijayaraman P. Permanent His-bundle pacing is feasible, safe, and superior to right ventricular pacing in routine clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Feb;12(2):305-12.

Mohamane D, Jobanputra Y, Kumar A, Krishnaswamy A, Mick S, White JM, Kapadia SR. Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;10(7):e005046.

Koelling TM, Aaronson KD, Cody RJ, Bach DS, Armstrong WE Prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Am. Heart J. 2002;144:524–9.

Vinereanu D. Mitral Regurgitation and Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: DYSSYNCHRONY AND MITRAL REGURGITATION. Echocardiography 2008;25:1155–66.

Urena M, Webb JG, Eltchaninoff H, Muñoz-García AJ, Bouleil C, Tamburino C, Nombela-Franco L, Nietispach F, Moris C, Ruel M, Dager AE, Serra V, Cheema AN, Amat-Santos U, de Brito FS, Lemos PA, Abizald A, Sarmento-Leite R, Ribeiro HB, Dumont E, Barbanit M, Durand E, Alonso Briales JH, Himbert D, Vahanian A, Imme S, Garcia E, Maïsano F, del Valle R, Benitez LM, García del Blanco B, Gutiérrez H, Perin MA, Siqueira D, Bernardi G, Philippon F, Rodés-Cabau J. Late cardiac death in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: incidence and predictors of advanced heart failure and sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 10;65(5):437-48.

Thomas G, Kim J, Lerman BB. Improving Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. Rev. 2019;8:220–7.

Lewis AJM, Foley P, Whinnett Z, Keene D, Chandrasekaran B. His Bundle Pacing: A New Strategy for Physiological Ventricular Activation. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e010972.

Boerlage-Van Dijk K, Kooiman KM, Yong ZY, Wiegerinck EM, Damman P, Bouma BI, Tijssen JG, Rek JJ, Knops RE, Baan J Jr. Predictors and permanency of cardiac conduction disorders and necessity of pacing after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Nov;37(11):1520-9.

Yamamura KH, Koosterman EM, Alba J, Garcia F, Williams PL, Mitran RD, Interlan A Jr. Analysis of charges and complications of permanent pacemaker implantation in the cardiac catheterization laboratory versus the operating room. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1999 Dec;22(12):1820-4.

Gilkson M, Nielsen JC, Kronborg MB, Michowitz Y, Auricchio A, Barbash IM, Barrabés JA, Boriani G, Braunschweig F, Brignole M, Burri H, Coats AJS, Deharo JC, Delgado V, Diller GP, Israel CV, Keren A, Knops RE, Kotecha D, Lederco C, Merkely B, Starck C, Thylén I, Tolosana JM; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 14;42(35):3427-3520. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2022 May 1;43(17):1651.

Downloads

Published

04-08-2025

How to Cite

1.
El Sherbini A, Hasheminia A, Soghrati N, Kuchibhatla A, Elsherif S, Abdel-Halim M, Abu-Omar Y, Pelletier M, El-Diasty M. Long-Term Impact Of Permanent Pacing After Mitral Valve Surgery: A Scoping Review Of Current Literature. Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 4 [cited 2025 Sep. 5];32(2):51-8. Available from: https://pjctvs.com/index.php/journal/article/view/479

Issue

Section

Review Article

Categories